![]() ![]() Instead, is it possible to create a bona fide 'IT8-like" target using various acrylic paints, measure all the patches with the ColorMunki and use those Lab measurements to make an actual funtioning profile of the scanner for the acrylic medium? ![]() The ColorMunki produces Lab values and I use Lab color samples in Photoshop to make the adjustments.īut that's a lot of work and is only a good starting point for doing the corrections. I scan the "targets" and then take spot samples with a ColorMunki Photo and use the spot samples to help create adjustment layers in Photoshop to compensate for the colour shifting in the scans. Since I scan a lot of paintings, I have created some "targets" with acrylic paints that I use to help with my colour corrections. Indeed, certain saturated pigments, such as in a painting, undergo significant colour shifts when scanned. But not for scanning, say, an acrylic or watercolour painting. Since the standard IT8-type targets are printed on film emulsions and photo papers, the profiles they produce will work well to scan transparencies or photo prints. From my reading and understanding of various posts and other documents, to properly profile a scanner for a certain input medium, one needs to use a target produced on the same or very similar medium. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |